Alternatively, the possibility may take the form of an additional fee which, if successful, is in addition to a negotiated legal fee, as specified by the parties in their fee contract. In the United Kingdom, for example, a customer may enter into a pricing contract under which the customer is responsible for an hourly fee plus a conditional pass fee of no more than 100% of the hourly price. Most lawyers who use this type of pricing agreement charge a 25-50% success fee. Under English law, fees are subject to compliance with the legal system. The Contingency Fee Agreement system has a long history in the United States; the first „No Win, no pay“ agreement dates back to the early 19th century and continues to this day as a numbered type of client-lawyer relationship in the area of injury law. It is a blessing for people who have been hurt or lost, and cannot afford a lawyer because medical expenses are increasing or because they must first pay the cost of a funeral. The unforeseen system provides access to the courts for victims of neglect who otherwise cannot afford to assert their rights. Tariff reforms were implemented in the Law on Mutual Legal Assistance, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders in 2012.  Under the new rules, applicants with conditional pricing agreements still do not pay advance fees or are required to pay their lawyers` expenses if the case is lost.
 If they win, they pay a „success tax“ that is limited to 25% of the damage awarded.  According to the American Bar Association, „a client only pays a contingency fee to a lawyer if the lawyer successfully handles a case.“ This is a kind of fee agreement that is generally used in cases where damages can be awarded, such as personal injury. B and personal injury or workers` compensation claims. The basis for a conditional agreement is simple: a lawyer agrees to deal with the case for a certain percentage of the money awarded. This means that if the aggrieved person succeeds, he or she will ultimately receive the agreed percentage of the final bonus, the rest will go to his or her lawyer. On the other hand, if the judgment is rendered in favour of the defendant in the case, the aggrieved person bears no financial burden and the lawyer is then left compensated for the legal services they provide. As a general rule, lawyers do not use conditional cost agreements for commercial transactions. But there is room for manoeuvre. A transaction lawyer may enter into a conditional agreement if he agrees to accept a reduced fee if the transaction is inconclusive. This agreement would correspond to s283 (1). If the case were successful, the practitioner would then calculate normal rates and an increase or success fee.
In transactions, there is no problem with eroded damage and undercompensated parts. Lawyers working outside of compensation procedures should consider conditional cost agreements and increase fees as a useful way to differentiate their practices and attract businesses.